Categories
Portfolio

Material – Recording

I went to Box Hill for wild camping and field recording. The fact that mechanical sounds – such as combustion engine, road noise and plane sound – got amplified easily while recording natural soundscapes and camping activities, annoyed me. I also did some field recording of birdsongs in Hackney Marshes. I borrowed a pair of LOM Basic UCHO from Kit room with Mix-Pre 6 for this recording trip. I would like to use natural soundscapes – nature making- along with the handmade recording.

Hackney Marshes

For the recording of craftsmanship, I went through the field recording archive that contains field recording I did in past two years. I found some sounds of wild cooking and firewood cutting. Also the sound of starting a fire. I am planning to do more recordings of different crafting sounds. For example, I went to Hackney City Farm few months ago for a woodturning workshop. The sounds of shaving the wood were fascinating (I regreted a bit that I didn’t record the sounds of the workshop then). I was also searching in some archives, such as BBC sound effects, to look for different crafting sounds. I also tried to use YouTube, where a lot of people record their processes of making – pottery or wood making.

Categories
Portfolio

Influence

I am doing some research on the artists who do or did the similar project. I found Owl project instantly after a while of research. ‘Owl Project is a collaborative group of artists consisting of Simon Blackmore, Antony Hall and Steve Symons. They work with wood and electronics to fuse sculpture and sound art, creating music making machines, interfaces and objects which intermix pre-steam and digital technologies. Drawing on influences such as 70’s synthesiser culture, DIY woodworking and current digital crafts, the resulting artwork is a quirky and intriguing critique of the allure and production of technology. The result is a distinctive range of musical and sculptural instruments that critique human interaction with computer interfaces and our increasing appetite for new and often disposable technologies.’

They have two project that are fairly similar to my idea. The first one is SoundLathe. Lathe is a primitive human power machine for wood and bowl turning. The put a sensors on the lathe, and it transfer the shape of the turning wood into data. Then using those data to modulate synth. It is performative project where the lather working on the lathe, and sound artists using those data for electronic music.

Another one is called Rock music. It works similar to SoundLathe. But rather than using Lathe as the sources, it use ‘Knapping’. It is the most primitive way to sharpening the stones, which they claim is a ‘5000 years back in time to one of the oldest known creative processes’. They also place the sensors on flint knapper hand. While the knapper hit the stone, it create signal to modulate the sounds.

Both project try to redundant processes with technology, and explore the traditional craftsmanship and it sounds. The difference to my project is that they only use the crafting action as a data to interact and create electronic music. Where for my project, I am trying to explore and using the sounds of the crafting itself. The ultimate are creating more like soundscape composition, rather than electronic or acousmatic music.

Categories
Portfolio

Sound of making

Now I am shifting the idea of human sounds with nature toward the sound of making. Most of the activities in wild camping are manual labour. We bring a lot of tools and resources, such as saw, axe, tents and fire starting tool, but all of them are just helping us to finish all tasks that require our labour. There aren’t any machines to help us, which can see those as our authentic way of living. Since wild camping listening workshop has some practical and ethical issues, I am trying to focus on the sound of human.

One of the fundamental reason why human are difference from other creature is using tools. We make our own tools as we evolve, and making technique and styles change overtime. Making becomes the essential in every culture and society, and it requires specialty. Hand-making becomes more and more rare after industrialisation, more and more making or tasks are replaced by machinery. While hand-making stuffs, the maker are extremely concentrate the present, they step by step carefully making toward the final product. I am thinking to capture this concentrated zone and time by recording the sound of making, and use them as the material for performance, which is another form of being present and making things.

Categories
Portfolio

Change from walking to performance

My original idea was bringing participants to a wild camping + listening trip, which I called Sound camping. The main goal of the activity is to explore and listen to the sound of humans in nature. By doing wild camping in a listening workshop setting – listening with collective ears, the workshop aims to seek the relationship between human and nature. Wild camping is a modern way of human surviving in nature, and perhaps is one of the modern activities that is the closest to nature. We are part of the natural soundscape, yet, the sounds we make are completely different from other animal’s sound.

However, after considering a few factors, I decided to do a performance instead of Sound Camping. The first factor is the accessibility. There are different type of soundwalk, but most of them are fairly accessible. This kind of practices are design for most of the people to experience. However, wild camping isn’t welcome for everyone. The physical requirement and people interests may stop them to have a full listening experiences. The land accessibility also is the factor that I considered. When big group of people going wild camping, it can disturb the native biosphere. Although we go there in an intention of study nature, we still have a certain degree of negative impact to the environment. The bioacoustics could be different as well because of our present.

Categories
Portfolio

Wild camping as soundwalk

According to Hildegard Westercamp, ‘A soundwalk is any excursion whose main purpose is listening to the environment. It is exposing our ears to every sound around us no matter where we are. We may be at home, we may be walking across a downtown street, through a park, along the beach; we may be sitting in a doctor’s office’ (Soundwalking”, Sound Heritage 3(4), 1974: 18). It is to heighten one’s awareness of the auditory environment. The activity of wild camping put the participant in the different acoustic environment for the period of time and for my personal experience, it could easily to heighten the awareness of the surrounding sonic environment. While one is immerse in the relative quiet environment for a while, the small sounds, that being cover by the overwhelming urban sounds, are become more audible. This effects can accompany with the instruction of sound walking.

Sound Camping – phase one: Soundwalking: Guiding the participants from the nearest town to the campsite. While we are walking, firstly listen the acoustic changes from the rural urban environment (the nearest town) to the walking path (the forest). Listen from the inter to the outer sounds. The footsteps that we made while walking, or the heavy breathing sound that we make while walking in the very steep uphill. While we already increase the awareness to the surrounding soundscapes the we arrived to the campsite.

Sound Camping – phase two: Soundcamping: Listen the sounds that we made while doing camping. The rustling of the tents which we are setting up. Sawing and cutting the firewood. The burning wood hissing sound. The boiling water. The sizzling sounds which we are cooking. Then, how do those sound related to the nature sounds. The rustling leaf and bushes cause by wind and animal. The birdsongs. The snapping sticks. This phase questions the relationship of human and nature.

Categories
Portfolio

Research Question

I am interested in wild camping and I did few project on this topic previously. When I was working on gallery 46 for exhibition, I set up a tent and using few speaker cones to try to recreate wild camping experience. However, thought the transmission of sounds by using different instruments and equipments (microphone, recorder, processing on computer, amplifier and speakers), the listening experience were no longer the same. The acoustic quality, the sounds from others pieces in the gallery, the sensation of indoor and outdoor alter the experience. Hence, the only way for audiences to experience the sonic journey of wild camping is through doing wild camping together, which is similarly to soundwalk. I am thinking to do a practice that is the mixture of wild camping and soundwalk – Sound Camping. The process of Sound Camping is the encourage the participant to listen the natural soundscapes around them, and most importantly, the sounds that we made while doing wild camping. The sounds of balance and imbalance of sounds of wild camping activities. The sounds of cutting and chopping fire wood, the sound of setting up the tents, the sound of burning campfire, the sound of cooking. The sounds of fire and cooking are generally consider as ‘natural’ and it matches the soundscape around us, but it actually a human-made sounds. To contrast campfire, the camping gas stove create a drone which may generally consider disturbing the nature. Then where is the boundary of human-made sounds.

Categories
Collaborating

Performance Reflection

I am really satisfied with the overall performance. I feel luck to have a chance to do improvise performance with Miles, Aprana and Mai. It is my first time to improvise with dancer. Weird enough, I have tried dance improvise and of course sound improvise, but never put both together. To work with a dancer, we have to create a clear structure and dynamic to play with. For sound improv, the moment seems could be slower, and most of the time, we want the changes as smooth as possible. So usually, the changing is like sine wave LFO. One the other hand, dancer are more responsive and dynamic are more various, it could he very high energy and drop to low and bring it back in few second, it is more like random wave LFO.

Categories
Collaborating

Move-in: Rehearsing with Mai

We booked the Black Box Studio for three days, and in the third day morning, we finally have a chance to rehearse with Mai. Mai bought some costumes for us to choose with. She got a hood and the cape which she can use as the imagery of the thrush. In terms of the improvisation, she started with a very static in the first parts, where she mainly use facial expression to response to our drones and noise. Our noise can be the symbol of expresses sorrow over the lack of joy and meaning in the world. Then moving the second part, where me and Aparna playing the acoustic instruments . In this part, acoustic instruments allow me to have better dynamic control in order to respond to Mai’s dance movements with precision. When I first hit the Tibetan Tingsha bell, Mai has a drastic movements, and jumps after every bell rings. Until, Miles granule the bells and that make every bell rings more subtle. Then I use harmonica as I as breathing at first, and Aparna start to play the instrument she made. The harmonica part, for me, are the most direct to respond to Mai. I keep look at her moment, and try to follow her dynamic, and go along with her moment. When she go faster, I go faster, then we bring it down at bit, like a wave.

Categories
Collaborating

Move-in: Preparation of Space

The first thing we have to decide is where are we going to be on the stage. Mai suggested us to sit on floor and surround her, however, we decide to put a L shape table on the corner, since our rehearsal are setting up like that, which have us more interaction between three of us. In the technical aspects, if we are in the same place, it’s better for the cable management since the main mixer is in our desk as well. Then, we have to set up the speakers. Firstly, Lou suggested us to put the sub under our table, because the low frequency are not very directional, but the audiences can subtly feel the bass are coming from us. Now we are in the corner, and we can’t put four speakers in the corner, otherwise, we will sit right in front one of the speaker, and blocking it. Therefore, I suggested the placement of speakers to be of rhombus shape within the square space. It is not the best setting sonically, but it still manage to cover the whole spaces, and more importantly, Mai can immerse to the sounds.

Another things have to sort out is the projector. We want to project some whites lines and words from the poem, and Miles and Aparna made the 45 min long video of those cutting words. However, that would be weird if we put the white screen in the all black stage. Therefore, we decided to use black cloths as the screens. But then, the black curtain in the studio are not flat at all, which will bend the words if we project on that. As a result, I borrow are huge polystyrene board and a stand with some black cloths from the sound arts technician attach on the board, to create a black projector screens. Finally, in terms of the lighting, we thought we could just use the DMX lights, but it is not bright enough, therefore, we asked the technician in the black box studio, to use one of the big LED light. Finally, I found the DMX lights have to use along with the DMX console to change the colours. Eventually, I set it up the light system, and I can fade in the light in the beginning of the show.

Categories
Collaborating

Rehearsal II

For the second and the last rehearsal, we started to finalise what we are going to use, and more importantly, the structure of the performance. It decided to three parts. In the beginning of the first part, we slowly bring in the simple wave drone. Aparna and Miles are mainly high pitch and I bring in the mid-low drone. Then, we gradually shift the pitch. And for me, I slowly fade in different field recording, such as the train and sound of the park to add more texture of the drone. I also start to increase the LFO that mapped to the panning of my drone. With the little twitch of the filter and the resonate, it create a spinning resonate sounds in the head. And it slowly hit to peak when Miles introduce more while noise and Aparna bring in more feedback.

In the second part, after the reaching the peak, we bring down the volume, and I slowly bring in the sparkling sounds of the fire, and bring down volume of the drone. Then, me and Aparna bring in the acoustic instrument and sounds. Aparna is using some rocks to go with the fire sounds, and I used Tibetan Tingsha Bells. After I heard my sounds are being granule as extra layer looping under, I swap to harmonica. The live granule that Miles makes, create a call and respond parts. In the end of this part, the granular becomes very drone, and sounds like an organ.

In the last part, I start to bring in the birdsongs, as to respond to the poem, the thrush. At the same time, I also add the more ambient sounds alone with the organ sounds, and Aparna also create a subtle drone underneath. Then in the end, I create some melodic bass sounds and we all gradually fade out until the birdsongs could be heard.